Methods

Methods

Drone, airborne and ground techniques: how they work and best uses.

Drone Magnetics Drone

UAV-borne magnetometer surveys

A lightweight magnetometer is flown beneath or ahead of a multirotor drone on pre-programmed lines. The instrument records the Earth's total magnetic field many times per second, and the processed grid shows where buried steel, magnetic rock units, faults and dykes disturb that field.

Terrain-following flight keeps the sensor at a steady height above ground. Data are corrected for diurnal variation using a base station, levelled between lines, and gridded. Derivative and reduced-to-pole products sharpen edges and place anomalies over their sources.

Drone Magnetics result
Drone Magnetics
Typical line spacing5 – 50 m
Sensor height2 – 60 m above ground
Production25 – 100 line-km per day
ResolutionSub-nT sensitivity, 10+ Hz sampling
Best for
  • Orphaned well casings and buried steel
  • UXO screening
  • Structural and lithologic mapping for mineral exploration
  • Steep, brushy or unsafe ground a field crew can't walk

Limitations: Responds only to magnetic materials. Non-ferrous targets such as plastic pipe, clay liners or voids need a different method.

Drone EM & GPR Drone

Electromagnetic and radar sensors in the air

Low-altitude drones now carry frequency-domain EM sensors and air-launched ground penetrating radar. These systems map near-surface conductivity and layering over areas that are wet, soft, contaminated or otherwise hard to reach on foot.

The drone flies a few metres above ground at walking speed. EM coils measure the secondary field induced in conductive ground; radar antennas record reflections from interfaces. Both are positioned with RTK GNSS so results tie directly to site coordinates.

Drone EM & GPR result
Drone EM & GPR
Flight height0.5 – 5 m above ground
EM depthUp to ~6 m (sensor dependent)
GPR depthIce, fresh water, dry sand: tens of metres
PositioningRTK GNSS, cm-level
Best for
  • Tailings and pond water/ice thickness
  • Soil salinity and moisture
  • Landfill boundaries
  • Snow and glacier studies

Limitations: Radar penetration drops sharply in clay and saline ground. Low flight height needs open terrain or careful planning.

Drone LiDAR & Photogrammetry Drone

Terrain models and orthomosaics

Every geophysical survey is easier to interpret on an accurate base map. We collect LiDAR point clouds and photogrammetric imagery by drone to produce bare-earth elevation models, contours and high-resolution orthomosaics.

LiDAR pulses pass through gaps in vegetation to reach the ground; photogrammetry reconstructs surfaces from overlapping photographs. Ground control and RTK positioning tie both to survey-grade coordinates.

Ground sample distance1 – 3 cm (imagery)
Point density100+ pts/m² (LiDAR)
Vertical accuracy3 – 5 cm typical with control
OutputsDEM, DSM, contours, orthomosaic
Best for
  • Terrain correction for gravity and magnetics
  • Flight planning for terrain-following surveys
  • Stockpile volumes and slope monitoring
  • Site base maps for reports

Limitations: Dense canopy reduces LiDAR ground returns; photogrammetry needs good light and texture.

Semi-Airborne EM (SAEM) Drone

Grounded transmitter, drone-borne receiver

Semi-airborne electromagnetics pairs a grounded transmitter with a drone-borne receiver. A long cable laid on the ground drives a controlled, multi-frequency current into the earth, and a drone flies a magnetic-field sensor over the area to record the response. The result maps electrical resistivity to depths of several hundred metres, far deeper than other drone EM systems, without walking every line.

A grounded electric dipole, typically one to a few kilometres long, transmits a square-wave current at a set of frequencies. The drone tows a three-component induction-coil or fluxgate magnetometer on lines across and around the transmitter. Frequency-domain transfer functions are computed between the transmitted current and the received magnetic field, then inverted in 1D, 2D or 3D to resistivity-depth sections and volumes. One transmitter setup covers several square kilometres before it is moved.

Semi-Airborne EM (SAEM) result
Semi-Airborne EM (SAEM)
TransmitterGrounded dipole, 1 – 4 km, 10 – 40 A
Frequencies~10 Hz – 10 kHz
Receiver3-component magnetometer on a drone, RTK positioned
Depth of investigationSeveral hundred metres, ground dependent
Line spacing50 – 200 m
OutputsResistivity-depth sections, depth slices, 3D models
Best for
  • Conductive mineralization: massive sulphides, graphite, alteration zones
  • Groundwater aquifers and saline interfaces at depth
  • Structural mapping beneath resistive or conductive cover
  • Steep, forested or restricted ground where ground EM is slow and helicopter EM is overkill

Limitations: Needs room and access to lay and ground the transmitter cable, and permission to inject current. Resolution decreases with depth, and strong cultural noise (power lines, pipelines, fences) must be planned around.

Airborne Geophysics

Helicopter and fixed-wing regional surveys

For areas measured in tens to thousands of square kilometres, helicopter and fixed-wing systems collect magnetics, time-domain EM, radiometrics and gravity. We design these programs, manage contractors, QC the data in the field and deliver the interpretation.

Survey aircraft fly parallel lines with tie lines for levelling. We specify line spacing, flight height and system to match the geological question, then check data daily against contract specifications before accepting it.

Airborne Geophysics result
Airborne Geophysics
Coverage100s – 1000s of line-km
SystemsMag, TEM, FDEM, radiometrics, gravity
Line spacing50 – 400 m typical
Our roleDesign, contractor oversight, QC, interpretation
Best for
  • District-scale mineral and lithium exploration
  • Basin-wide groundwater mapping
  • Geothermal and structural studies
  • Targeting follow-up ground and drone work

Limitations: Mobilization cost makes small areas uneconomic. Drone surveys often fill the gap between ground and full airborne.

Electrical Resistivity Tomography

2D and 3D resistivity imaging

Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) passes current through the ground between electrode pairs and measures the resulting voltage on many others. Inversion turns thousands of readings into a cross-section or volume of subsurface resistivity.

Clay, saline water and some ore minerals conduct; dry sand, gravel, fresh bedrock and voids resist. Mapping these contrasts outlines aquifers, contamination, fracture zones, bedrock depth and cavities.

Electrical Resistivity Tomography result
Electrical Resistivity Tomography
Depth of investigation~1/5 of array length (to 100+ m)
Electrode spacing0.5 – 10 m
ArraysDipole-dipole, Wenner, Schlumberger, gradient
Formats2D profiles, 3D grids, time-lapse
Best for
  • Aquifer and water-table mapping
  • Karst and void detection
  • Landfill and plume delineation
  • Dam and levee seepage

Limitations: Needs electrode contact with the ground, which is slow on pavement or frozen ground. Resolution decreases with depth.

Induced Polarization

Chargeability for disseminated minerals and clay

Induced polarization (IP) is collected alongside resistivity and measures how the ground stores electrical charge. Disseminated sulfides, graphite and some clays hold charge and show up as chargeable zones.

After the transmitter current switches off, the voltage decays rather than dropping instantly. The size and shape of that decay (chargeability) is inverted with resistivity to map mineralized and altered ground.

DepthTens to several hundred metres
MeasurementsTime-domain chargeability, spectral IP
Acquired withERT, same electrodes
OutputsResistivity + chargeability sections
Best for
  • Porphyry and disseminated sulfide exploration
  • Clay versus salt water discrimination
  • Landfill waste characterization

Limitations: Slower than resistivity alone and sensitive to cultural noise near fences and pipelines.

Frequency-Domain EM

Rapid conductivity mapping

Frequency-domain electromagnetic (FDEM) instruments use a transmitter coil to induce currents in the ground and a receiver coil to measure the response. No ground contact is needed, so large areas can be mapped quickly on foot, by vehicle or by drone.

The quadrature component maps apparent conductivity; the in-phase component is highly sensitive to metal. Multi-coil and multi-frequency instruments give several depths at once.

Depth0.5 – 6 m (instrument dependent)
PlatformsHandheld, cart, ATV, drone
ProductionHectares per hour
OutputsConductivity and in-phase maps
Best for
  • Buried drums, tanks and metal debris
  • Soil salinity and texture
  • Landfill boundaries
  • Pipeline and utility corridors

Limitations: Shallow penetration. Fences, vehicles and powerlines add noise that must be edited out.

Time-Domain EM

Deep soundings for groundwater and exploration

Time-domain EM (TEM) switches off a current in a large loop and records how induced currents diffuse into the ground. Early times see shallow layers and late times see deep ones, so each sounding gives a resistivity-depth profile.

Soundings are inverted into layered models and stitched into sections or 3D volumes. TEM sees through resistive cover to deep conductive targets and maps fresh/saline interfaces well.

Time-Domain EM result
Time-Domain EM
Depth10 m to 500+ m
Loop size20 – 400 m
FormatsSoundings, profiles, towed systems
OutputsStitched resistivity sections
Best for
  • Aquifer thickness and saltwater interface
  • Lithium brine exploration
  • Deep conductors in mineral exploration
  • Geothermal clay caps

Limitations: Poor resolution of thin resistive layers; sensitive to nearby metal infrastructure.

Ground Magnetics

Walking and cart magnetometer surveys

Ground magnetometer surveys map the same magnetic field as drones but at the highest possible resolution, with the sensor carried or towed close to the ground.

Gradiometer configurations cancel regional field changes and highlight shallow objects. Walking surveys cover tight grids around structures where flying is not practical.

Line spacing0.5 – 25 m
SensorsCesium vapor, fluxgate, gradiometer
Sensitivity0.01 nT
OutputsTMI, gradient, analytic signal
Best for
  • UXO and buried metal
  • Archaeological features
  • Well casings in built-up areas
  • Detailed follow-up of drone anomalies

Limitations: Slower than drone coverage and affected by nearby steel buildings and vehicles.

Gravity

Density contrasts at depth

Gravity surveys measure tiny variations in the Earth's gravitational pull caused by density differences below ground. They map basin depth, faults, dense ore bodies and, at microgravity scale, voids and cavities.

Each station is precisely leveled and positioned. Readings are corrected for drift, tides, elevation and terrain (which is why accurate drone-derived elevation models matter) to produce Bouguer and residual anomaly maps.

Station spacing1 m (microgravity) to km (regional)
Precision~0.005 mGal
DepthMetres to kilometres
OutputsBouguer, residual, 2D/3D models
Best for
  • Basin geometry for groundwater
  • Fault mapping for geothermal
  • Sinkholes and mine voids
  • Massive sulfide targets

Limitations: Slow station-by-station acquisition; needs high-accuracy elevation data.

Ground Penetrating Radar

High-resolution shallow imaging

Ground penetrating radar (GPR) transmits short radio pulses into the ground and records reflections from buried objects and layer boundaries. It gives the highest resolution of any surface method in the upper few metres.

Antenna frequency sets the trade-off: high frequencies resolve rebar in concrete, low frequencies see deeper into soils. Hyperbolic reflections mark pipes and point targets; continuous reflectors mark layers and bedrock.

Ground Penetrating Radar result
Ground Penetrating Radar
Frequencies40 MHz – 2.6 GHz
DepthCentimetres to ~20 m (ground dependent)
PlatformsCart, handheld, vehicle, drone
OutputsProfiles, depth slices, 3D volumes
Best for
  • Utility locating
  • Concrete scanning
  • Unmarked graves and archaeology
  • Ice and water depth

Limitations: Clay and saline soils absorb the signal and can limit penetration to less than a metre.

Seismic Refraction & Reflection

Velocity and layering for engineering

Seismic methods time sound waves from a hammer, weight drop or other source as they travel through the ground. Refraction tomography maps velocity and rippability; reflection images layer geometry at greater depth.

Geophones along a line record first arrivals. Velocity increases from soil to weathered to fresh rock, so the velocity model shows depth to bedrock and weak zones.

Seismic Refraction & Reflection result
Seismic Refraction & Reflection
Depth5 – 100 m typical
Geophone spacing1 – 5 m
SourcesSledgehammer, weight drop, accelerated source
OutputsVelocity tomograms, rippability
Best for
  • Depth to bedrock
  • Rippability for excavation
  • Landslide failure surfaces
  • Dam and foundation sites

Limitations: Refraction cannot see a slower layer beneath a faster one. Traffic and wind add noise.

MASW & Passive Seismic

Shear-wave velocity profiles

Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) and passive methods such as HVSR measure shear-wave velocity, which is tied directly to soil stiffness and seismic site class.

Surface-wave dispersion is extracted from recorded data and inverted for shear-wave velocity with depth. Passive recordings use ambient noise and work in urban settings.

Depth10 – 50+ m
Key outputVs30 and shear-wave profiles
StandardsSupports IBC/ASCE 7 site class
AcquisitionActive and passive arrays
Best for
  • Seismic site classification
  • Soil stiffness for foundations
  • Void and soft-zone screening

Limitations: Assumes roughly flat layering; strong lateral changes complicate results.

Borehole Geophysics

Logging wells and boreholes

Borehole logging lowers probes down wells to measure natural gamma, resistivity, conductivity, temperature, fluid flow and acoustic or optical images of the borehole wall.

Logs tie surface geophysics to real geology, identify productive zones, locate fractures and verify well construction.

LogsGamma, resistivity, EM induction, temperature, fluid
ImagingOptical and acoustic televiewer
DepthTo ~1,000 m (tool dependent)
OutputsComposite logs, fracture analysis
Best for
  • Water well screen placement
  • Fracture mapping
  • Calibrating surface resistivity
  • Mineral exploration drill holes

Limitations: Requires an open or suitably cased hole.

Waterborne Surveys

Lakes, rivers and ponds

Towed resistivity streamers, boat-mounted GPR, magnetometers and bathymetric sonar extend our methods onto ponds, reservoirs and rivers.

Instruments are mounted on small boats or remotely operated vessels with GNSS positioning. Results combine water depth, sediment thickness and sub-bottom geology.

EnvironmentsPonds, reservoirs, rivers, tailings ponds
MethodsTowed ERT, GPR, mag, sonar
VesselsSmall craft and remote boats
OutputsBathymetry, sediment thickness
Best for
  • Tailings pond sediment
  • Groundwater/surface water exchange
  • Dam and intake inspection
  • Sediment volume for dredging

Limitations: Weather and water access control scheduling.

Connect with us

Let's talk about your project.

Send a location and the question you need answered. We'll recommend a method and a budget range.